1996-06-10 - Re: Anti-Scientologists

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 144ab19a746a2c304f24626c978f017b9ebbd8268a11366523100fa8e439a7d1
Message ID: <199606101537.RAA11056@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-10 22:03:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 06:03:46 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 06:03:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anti-Scientologists
Message-ID: <199606101537.RAA11056@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



James A. Donald wrote:
>
> At 07:13 PM 6/9/96 +0200, Anonymous wrote:
> >Truth #1: It is a religion
> >Truth #2: It is no longer a cult, since the leader is dead.
> 
> Truth number 3:  It charges fifty thousand dollars or so for
> secrets of "religous technology" that are available free of charge
> on the internet.

So?


Declan wrote:

> Truth #2: Cults can exist in the absence of a charismatic leader.

Would you describe Christianity as a cult?  If not, why not?








Thread