1996-06-22 - Re: DCSB: Electronic Commerce: The State of the Art

Header Data

From: Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1592439e75f11fafd079a63f2b312fcc9093517bc4650e6ea98b96b43088666e
Message ID: <9606211927.AA14661@sabel.idacom.hp.com>
Reply To: <19960621090343293.AAA253@geoff>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-22 03:03:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:03:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Martin Janzen <janzen@idacom.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:03:35 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DCSB: Electronic Commerce: The State of the Art
In-Reply-To: <19960621090343293.AAA253@geoff>
Message-ID: <9606211927.AA14661@sabel.idacom.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Geoff Klein writes:
> [...]
> In the process of testing PSecure I have collected from the 
> keyservers, the keys of most people on the list who pgp sign their 
> messages. (Another neat feature of PSecure makes this a one click task)

> I could quite easily perform the service of bouncing messages with bad 
> signature back to the list.

> Please let me know if people agree that this would be a useful 
> service, or is it inappropriate ?

Bounced messages would probably be considered inappropriate noise by
most list members.  However, what about bouncing the message back to the
sender only?  This alerts him to a possible problem -- a bad keyserver
entry, an attempted forgery, a mail transmission error, etc. -- without
bothering everyone else.

MJ

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMcr3eG3Fsi8cupgZAQGprwP/RwVsYIiMZ5ZmMTM+d6i/p4u6sUdV0Jye
MFtPX79z2mcW8Mr7LpWqYNZojbr2lLvBie9kIsjKJDdYcvMrs5/5Mgagm4TlKIss
mRHve7HuijdTO17p8heHdjbIYo2Rk57O/8oYafHU9hit3+dpsX7OdQB3oFKH0Uy2
MQKry5CU+qc=
=k0VT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread