1996-06-18 - Re: More secure web browser

Header Data

From: “Chris Adams” <adamsc@io-online.com>
To: “cypherpunks” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 179cf265876479a6e83985ff239fffd801f508ae3caa2b737932802cf21fff7e
Message ID: <199606180547.WAA10509@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-18 10:30:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:30:59 +0800

Raw message

From: "Chris Adams" <adamsc@io-online.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:30:59 +0800
To: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: More secure web browser
Message-ID: <199606180547.WAA10509@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Chris> This is all I got from the anonymizer test site (URL was posted  
>Chris> recently).
>Chris> <BR> Your Internet browser is IBM-WebExplorer-DLL/v1.1b.
>Chris> <BR> You are coming from .
>Chris> Seems reasonably private. Unfortunately, it's not an option if you  
>Chris> don't use OS/2...
>I doubt it.  You're only `private' wrt hostname because io-online's
>reverse DNS tables appear (very) broken.  This has nothing to do with
>the browser or the O/S.

I wasn't referring to that. I was referring to the fact that ALL it had
was WebExplorer and the hostname. Some of the other browsers release a
LOT of extra information...
BTW, no OS-supremacy was intendeded - merely a realization of the fact
that WebExplorer is an OS/2 only product.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             







Thread