1996-06-10 - Re: US: Domestic Encryption Protected by US Constitution?

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1a1c4df320f2c14292c8f0c45168385797dba7bb90007c653866b923b0fbe081
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960609214558.00b44844@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-10 02:58:23 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:58:23 +0800

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 10:58:23 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: US: Domestic Encryption Protected by US Constitution?
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960609214558.00b44844@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:36 PM 6/8/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:

>I don't think we want crypto controlled by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
>and Firearms, do we?

That'd be the BATFC.  To be called "bat fuck" in the popular press (but not
on the post-CDA Net).

DCF

"If you have a job opening in a cool climate for an experienced technical
author  with a solid understanding of cryptography, write to me."






Thread