1996-06-07 - Re: Clipper III analysis

Header Data

From: “Chris Adams” <adamsc@io-online.com>
To: “cypherpunks” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 22c8062eafaa70361024366f60b45672091110ebe7fb6c834aeba2be0b52700d
Message ID: <199606070506.WAA20841@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-07 11:17:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 19:17:50 +0800

Raw message

From: "Chris Adams" <adamsc@io-online.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 19:17:50 +0800
To: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Clipper III analysis
Message-ID: <199606070506.WAA20841@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 29 May 1996 14:53:30 pdt, tcmay@got.net wrote:

>>        A good Questioned Document Examiner will be able to demonstrate
>>        that the signed document in question was not authored by Joe
>>        Blow, even if it contains his digital signature.
>
>I was of course talking about digital signatures, not handwritten signatures.
>
>I would be very interested to hear how a "Questioned Document Examiner" can
>possibly determine that a digital signature was not applied by a particular
>person.

I believe he was referring to document analysis. By closely comparing a questionable work 
with those of known authorship, a skilled analyst can hopefully find enough 
[dis]similarities to say whether a document was authored by a given person.

This Message Was Sent With An UNREGISTERED Version Of PMMail.  
Please Encourage Its Author To Register Their Copy Of PMMail.  
For More Information About PMMail And SouthSide Software's Other 
Products, Contact http://www.southsoft.com.







Thread