From: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2cd399ded027807670206519599043e48f6a6c09aa19eda3b1100d86f4aab89d
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960610194210.009e3afc@mail.teleport.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-11 01:52:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 09:52:16 +0800
From: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 09:52:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anti-Scientologists
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960610194210.009e3afc@mail.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 05:37 PM 6/10/96 +0200, someone wrote:
[snip]
>Declan wrote:
>
>> Truth #2: Cults can exist in the absence of a charismatic leader.
>
>Would you describe Christianity as a cult? If not, why not?
So we're going to argue about whether the word "cult" should apply
to CoS?? Okay, how about this: it's a _religion_ that uses
deception, mind control techniques, and criminal activities to
attempt to get as much possible money from as many marks^H^H^H^H^H
worshippers as possible, and goes to extreme lengths to silence
its critics.
Is that better?
Hubbard started CoS because he was getting too much heat over the
quackery and pseudoscience in "Dianetics."
I'm going to start a religion, too, called the Church of the Shell
Game. Don't you call it a cult, or I'll be real mad!
Rich
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMbx6cYT0GKfZRA/9AQFUTwP+ODigyynDs76o039u/SgxP5K54LSOjsh+
AoKWi81U/cHwPABNZ+fhoP+Hcpd21m4mycWRcFoMwW/VC1xfuEYaCRrqhUlJy5oe
EMYlHNbZQ/klZPBnZkfBZSJFApWpeZTfsaAPKnzwtEGJVTGd0GtdnUe8X2mfCJHJ
Hc5gmTmyQvA=
=RZOB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
______________________________________________________________________
Rich Burroughs richieb@teleport.com http://www.teleport.com/~richieb
See my Blue Ribbon Page at http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/blueribbon
New EF zine "cause for alarm" - http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/cause
Return to June 1996
Return to “Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>”
1996-06-11 (Tue, 11 Jun 1996 09:52:16 +0800) - Re: Anti-Scientologists - Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>