From: Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 46f0137ef74f7ba13981a88cd74f349c38fd5ea9dc038c8a0a4a6a647810930f
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960620105421.115A-100000@invictor.miworld.net>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9606191052.A14088-0100000@netcom6>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-20 21:31:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 05:31:17 +0800
From: Intense <exalt@miworld.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 05:31:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Current status of RSA patent...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9606191052.A14088-0100000@netcom6>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960620105421.115A-100000@invictor.miworld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
does not matter - it will be renewed in the interest of the government
The goverment want's there backdoor... would you expect less?
the only pgp I will use is that from MIT
it has no back door
* <exalt@miworld.net> *
On Wed, 19 Jun 1996, Paul S. Penrod wrote:
>
> Can anyone provide additional information on the RSA patent status?
> If memory serves me, it is due to expire sometime in 1997.
>
> Also, what are the ramifications of deploying software based around it,
> such as PGP 2.62i (from UK)?
>
> ...Paul
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there
> is no need to do so, almost everybody gets busy on the proof"
>
> -- John Kenneth Galbraith
>
> "Success is attending a funeral as a spectator"
>
> -- E. BonAnno
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Return to June 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”