From: Bryan L Andrews <Bryan_L_Andrews@ccm.fm.intel.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 487f1f0ad2d02700ba52cc462633db5552903830392ddf198e5abb1b271f96dd
Message ID: <Sat, 15 Jun 96 03:51:58 PDT_2@ccm.fm.intel.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-15 13:54:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1996 21:54:18 +0800
From: Bryan L Andrews <Bryan_L_Andrews@ccm.fm.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1996 21:54:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Elevator Problem
Message-ID: <Sat, 15 Jun 96 03:51:58 PDT_2@ccm.fm.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Text item:
Rob wrote:
>This may be old hat, but an earlier post (around the time the Kocher
>RSA-timing attack came out) to the list asked about the "Elevator
>Problem", where two parties who think they share the same secret want
>to confirm it on an open channel. I came up with an idea for a
>protocol but never got around to posting it, and dropped off the list
>briefly... so pardon me if this is already touched upon.
............
>Comments?
This reminds me of the discussions I've seen over the last few months regarding
oblivious transfers/zero-based transactions. Good article in Scientific
American on it a few months ago.
Bryan.
Text item:
Return to June 1996
Return to “Bryan L Andrews <Bryan_L_Andrews@ccm.fm.intel.com>”
1996-06-15 (Sat, 15 Jun 1996 21:54:18 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem - Bryan L Andrews <Bryan_L_Andrews@ccm.fm.intel.com>