From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: adamsc@io-online.com
Message Hash: 50d23ef69e35fecb48c2e168bf16ad7237c55bc1b1fdb0f7a0e0a974138f9bde
Message ID: <199606022112.RAA27954@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-02 23:52:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 07:52:50 +0800
From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 07:52:50 +0800
To: adamsc@io-online.com
Subject: Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions)
Message-ID: <199606022112.RAA27954@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 30 May 96 at 1:26, Chris Adams wrote:
> How about a NSA-stomper option that would use all-of-the-above? For the truly paranoid (or
> owners of Pentium-Pro 200Mhz multi-processor machines
Chances are that if the algorithms alone aren't "NSA-stompers", an
all-of-the-above option won't be.
> Also, what's the verdict on IDEA? Is there a switch yet that would allow straight RSA?
> (with the obvious speed decrease...)
That would actually be less secure. RSA may be PGP's weakest link.
Rob.
---
No-frills sig.
Befriend my mail filter by sending a message with the subject "send help"
Key-ID: 5D3F2E99 1996/04/22 wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (root@magneto)
AB1F4831 1993/05/10 Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Send a message with the subject "send pgp-key" for a copy of my key.
Return to June 1996
Return to ““Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>”
1996-06-02 (Mon, 3 Jun 1996 07:52:50 +0800) - Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions) - “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>