From: geoff@commtouch.co.il (geoff)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 52984b8ed0293b1fd017ca4a038cc6a811ad8293d0ee33b1d204694de665d09f
Message ID: <19960624094226014.AAA227@geoff.commtouch.co.il>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-25 05:30:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:30:57 +0800
From: geoff@commtouch.co.il (geoff)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:30:57 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bad Signatures
Message-ID: <19960624094226014.AAA227@geoff.commtouch.co.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Mon Jun 24 12:48:55 1996
Thanks to all list members who responded on this issue.
The consensus is that bouncing bad signatures to the list is not a
good idea.
In the interest of reducing the number of bad signatures caused by
munging which appear on the list, I will continue to bounce messages
with bad signatures to the originator only.
Thanks,
Geoff Klein.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMc5WeELv5OMYFK1FAQEiAAP/fr0+Z1dmGfuRgiGqir9396+DSJ+eBquS
0JM9FxtMvZwyCsafsJSwZSHBPWtLanaAzFMgO5SigWSki6hP3sP/ywrH0qni480U
7d0CG9gz2g2N6pYAjE8nhFT26NUVFBvm/csPod+3W71/vvg/KP3vRas2fWRqRzQY
wEV2g4aaTII=
=rh71
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to June 1996
Return to “geoff@commtouch.co.il (geoff)”
1996-06-25 (Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:30:57 +0800) - Re: Bad Signatures - geoff@commtouch.co.il (geoff)