1996-06-26 - Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: William Knowles <erehwon@c2.org>
Message Hash: 53cce07127b73958150cb07928c3c3d9dd60ae68f36de70214d2f5ba60732331
Message ID: <199606260954.FAA02843@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960625220103.16972A@infinity.c2.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-26 13:30:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:30:46 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:30:46 +0800
To: William Knowles <erehwon@c2.org>
Subject: Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960625220103.16972A@infinity.c2.org>
Message-ID: <199606260954.FAA02843@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



William Knowles writes:
> With all the talk about InterNIC zapping domains, there should be
> some talk about other registries, Alternic.net : http://www.alternic.net
> is offering an alpha test for registering new TLD's and the prices
> are considerably less expensive than the Internic.

The AlterNIC is a figment of its creators imagination. It has about
the same credibility level as the claim of the Freemen that they
aren't subject to U.S. law.

They can offer to sell you anything they like, of course, and you can
pay them, but you don't get anything at all for the money. Domains
registered with them don't appear in the real DNS.

.pm





Thread