From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: Sean T Carnes <crisper@ascensionet.com>
Message Hash: 541f892c8e52cc4480df1b3aa56312076f6dfe85788d823810c866b563b1883a
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960607131001.13383B-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <01BB545E.2DDAE5C0@ppp3>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-07 23:16:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 07:16:13 +0800
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 07:16:13 +0800
To: Sean T Carnes <crisper@ascensionet.com>
Subject: Re: Banking's Physical Security
In-Reply-To: <01BB545E.2DDAE5C0@ppp3>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960607131001.13383B-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 5 Jun 1996, Sean T Carnes wrote:
> We all know that banks are very highly protected as far as their
money goes but how safe are there computers? I live very close to a
computer database collecting company that collects the data related to
many banks in the area. It is all done through land lines and is not
very well protected. They aren't very careful about who or what they
let into the building also. If someone were to cut the lines the banks
in the area would be out for days and they wouldn't have a means to do
interbank transactions outside of the immediate area. Has anyone else
seen this in there area or heard of it. Wouldn't it be a better idea to
do the transactions by satellite.
^^
Very vulnerable to jamming.
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to June 1996
Return to “Sean T Carnes <crisper@ascensionet.com>”