From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 11:32:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Optimism re NRC Cryptography Report
Message-ID: <9605312250.AA20290@rpcp.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:40 AM 5/31/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>This should be enough to ensure our victory. (Not that I think that even
>fairly repressive legislation would've been enough to defeat us, but a new
>breathing spell can only help.)

        Actually, I felt this upon reading the general recommendations, but
then in reading the expansion of the recommendations, I could see a lot
there for the continuance of the "status-quo" type of attitude. After
talking about it with other people, my feeling is that the document might be
all things to all people...? Pro-crypto will be happy with it and point to
this para and that, "anti"-crypto (law enforcement type) could also be happy
with it and point to that para and the other. The question then is, how will
it be read/perceived by its audience (which I suspect is legislators.) Given
the way the press is reporting, it is being received as a pro-crypto report,
congress might pick up on it. Unfortunately, it might pick up on it with
respect to publicity and posturing, and a fair amount of "the briefing" back
door stuff will continue.

        Can't say though.
_______________________
Regards,            If it weren't for the last minute, 
                    nothing would ever get done.
Joseph  Reagle      http://farnsworth.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html
reagle@mit.edu      E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65  BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E