From: Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: “M.Wagoner (1)” <safemail@ntrnet.net>
Message Hash: 5e229ebd51e136e8b52997e6fbb72d4f3f6fbd81e8308c8844e7760dcf9055d6
Message ID: <31C61F7A.3C30CB2B@cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199606172131.RAA00953@ns1.ntrnet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-18 06:32:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 14:32:41 +0800
From: Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 14:32:41 +0800
To: "M.Wagoner (1)" <safemail@ntrnet.net>
Subject: Re: Are Intrested in a new approach to Cryptography???????
In-Reply-To: <199606172131.RAA00953@ns1.ntrnet.net>
Message-ID: <31C61F7A.3C30CB2B@cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
M.Wagoner (1) wrote:
>
> We have superior Russian Encryption that cannot be broken. We would love to
> send you a copy of this software as a challenge to do so. Do you do such things?
> Our encryption far exceeds the military standard of 1024 bit encryption,
> hundreds of times over. I was told that if anyone could break this, it would
> be your organization or anyone else associated with the 'Cypher Punks'.
Basically, we are not interested. We are not a free cryptanalysis
service. Besides, we already have effectively unbreakable encryption -
our main interest is integrating ciphers that have already stood the
test of time into useful applications.
Best of luck, though.
Raph
Return to June 1996
Return to “Raph Levien <raph@cs.berkeley.edu>”
Unknown thread root