1996-06-04 - Re: your mail
Header Data
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: qut@netcom.com
Message Hash: 65250cfc0faa476e5fd3072a42ec6186dbf82c358762227f693deee5c92088e3
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960603233917.7894A-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <199606040046.RAA17821@netcom6.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-04 08:34:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 16:34:09 +0800
Raw message
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 16:34:09 +0800
To: qut@netcom.com
Subject: Re: your mail
In-Reply-To: <199606040046.RAA17821@netcom6.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960603233917.7894A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996 qut@netcom.com wrote:
> ncr terminals are the most 31173 D0Dz
I think you mean 31337.
(eiite doesn't make much sense)
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com
Thread
Return to June 1996
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
- Return to ““Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>”
Return to “qut@netcom.com”
- 1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 13:28:13 +0800) - No Subject - qut@netcom.com
- 1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 16:34:09 +0800) - Re: your mail - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-06-04 (Wed, 5 Jun 1996 05:17:31 +0800) - Re: your mail - “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>