From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 65f0b7599a968fa0f82147dc5300db2a6b0b6946289dcc521e1a4609042594d5
Message ID: <199606290306.FAA23041@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 05:55:31 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:55:31 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:55:31 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199606290306.FAA23041@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh) spake thus and so:
>WASHINGTON, DC -- With no fanfare and no hype, the Justice Department
>yesterday faxed a 39-word statement to Senator Exon saying they will
>appeal their loss in the Philadelphia case.
>
>The consolidated lawsuits of ACLU v. Reno and ALA v. DoJ resulted in a
>victory for the plaintiffs earlier this month after a three-judge panel
>granted a preliminary injunction preventing the DoJ from enforcing the
>Communications Decency Act.
Sounds like a case of "political testicles in a vise." This smells like
an election-year maneuver so the Clinton administration can maintain its
faade. (After all, who wants to be called "soft on the protection of
children"?) By the time it's finally settled, the Congresscritters will
have been re-elected and can go merrily back to perverting the
Constitution.
So how'd we wind up having to choose between *these* two yahoos for
President? :-)
Return to June 1996
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:55:31 +0800) - No Subject - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)