From: John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>
To: Sandy Sandfort <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6a707f5abe64d18dbea735545b76fff58ebbaf9e45b7daf9cd64cb16adf5b005
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960531185137.00d74220@mail.software.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-01 01:17:50 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 09:17:50 +0800
From: John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 09:17:50 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Privacy (was Re: Something that just crossed my mind. Sorry.)
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960531185137.00d74220@mail.software.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:01 AM 5/31/96 -0700, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> SANDY SANDFORT
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>>Two quick answers:
>
>1) What big business wants and what it would be
> willing to accept in order to make sales, are
> two different things. While demographic data
> are nice, an more robust economy full of big
> spenders is better.
>
>2) Big businesses are made up of individuals.
> Most individuals would still prefer to have
> their own privacy preserved even if they would
> prefer less privacy for others.
>
>
I think what most people want is no surprises, by that I mean that peoples
perceptions of privacy should match reality. In many cases that will mean
no demographics. However there are a lot of situations where people will
trade information for something they perceive as having value. I see
nothing wrong with this *if* there is informed consent.
John Pettitt, jpp@software.net
EVP, CyberSource Corporation, 415 473 3065
PGP Key available at:
http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/htbin/pks-extract-key.pl?op=get&search=0xB7AA3705
Return to June 1996
Return to “John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>”
1996-06-01 (Sat, 1 Jun 1996 09:17:50 +0800) - Privacy (was Re: Something that just crossed my mind. Sorry.) - John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>