From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Bill Stewart <jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)
Message Hash: 6b1c87e8a076973500250d34d45b42b2542e6b43aca9c32041a8e1ebbb932fba
Message ID: <199606291758.KAA19598@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 20:20:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:20:15 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:20:15 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)
Subject: Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping)
Message-ID: <199606291758.KAA19598@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:03 AM 6/28/96 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
> If you don't do it carefully,
> you'll end up needing a bunch of Above-Top-Level nameservers that
> serve the names of the tens of thousands of top-level domains.
Five thousand top level domain names is quite manageable, no big problem
provided that their servers are reasonably stable -- and if the unstable
ones do not work well, big deal.
A hundred thousand would be a problem.
Assume a top level domain typically lasts forever, and a top level server
typically lasts ten years. Assume two new top level domain names appear
each day, and that it typically takes a several of months of reliable service
to be added to the most generally accepted lists. This does not seem to
constitute an intolerable burden to most domain name server administrators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to June 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
1996-06-29 (Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:20:15 +0800) - Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping) - jamesd@echeque.com