1996-06-18 - Re: Remailer Operator Liability?

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: Duncan Frissell <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 722ea9ada4b8ea74a59e9cf4073c7e3ed360bcfa897782a28d1c5107830e5e1a
Message ID: <v02120d52adeb5e9f2fe4@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-18 02:37:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:37:04 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:37:04 +0800
To: Duncan Frissell <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
Message-ID: <v02120d52adeb5e9f2fe4@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 9:45 6/17/96, Duncan Frissell wrote:
>At 08:43 AM 6/17/96 -0400, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
>
>>I believe we used the term "email exploder" instead of "mailing list,"
>>particularly in cross-examination and closing arguments, to convey the
>>idea that such a device is often used for conversation, not just one-way
>>communication.
>
>Was this term invented during the hearings or has anyone heard of it before?

I have heard of it before. I believe "mail exploder" is a rather old term.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Disclaimer: My opinions are my own.







Thread