1996-06-18 - Re: SafE Mail Corporation

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 752f869fcd42aafd75e524c2df07faa2137246cdc71d151c4a1e9e716e7cfbe1
Message ID: <v02120d56adec0a567ae3@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-18 11:52:15 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:52:15 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:52:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SafE Mail Corporation
Message-ID: <v02120d56adec0a567ae3@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 17:21 6/17/96, M.Wagoner (1 wrote:
>We would like someone to be able or should I say try and crack our
>encryption. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.

Sigh. Yet another one...

Unless you make source code available, you will be at best ignored, and at
worst sued by users of your product should they discover that your
unbreakable encryption isn't so unbreakable after all. Unless you use a
hardware RNG and OTPs, your statement that it is impossible to break your
encryption software is simply false. Do not expect that individuals who do
have clue are going to waste their time on trying to break an encryption
scheme invented by someone that so obviously doesn't know what he is doing.

Go back to bed.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Disclaimer: My opinions are my own.







Thread