From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 11:15:41 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: Electronic Signature Act Of 1996
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960604165840.00725e30@popmail.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       SANDY SANDFORT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C'punks,

At 11:11 AM 6/4/96 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

>...I get the impression that under the common law, an ink 
>signature is merely a demonstration that a party assented 
>to a contract, and except for certain contracts (which 
>usually require witnesses etc.) there is no requirement in 
>the law that a contract even be on paper...

The "Statute of Frauds" lists the exceptions and they cover
most important contracts.  I seem to recall that contracts
over a given amount or for interests in real property for 
periods of a year or more are covered.  I'm sure someone 
with current access to legal research resources will post
a better explanation.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~