1996-06-01 - Re: Statistical analysis of anonymous databases

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 884a97d9e58d7e5a65c908f528caf25830f69af0552e06071de16f1c7b505b01
Message ID: <v02120d14add55f5f9a05@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-01 06:43:50 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 14:43:50 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 14:43:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Statistical analysis of anonymous databases
Message-ID: <v02120d14add55f5f9a05@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 15:53 5/31/96, David Wagner wrote:

>How about a simple non-technical solution?  Each patient picks a
>random pseudonym; the database is keyed off that pseudonym, and the
>person's True Name(tm) never appears in the database.  Patients
>should remember their pseudonym (or write it down); then they can
>add information to the database.

In medical research, third party audit, i.e., the Department of Health and
Human Services, is often required. A simple pseudonym picked by the patient
won't do.


Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread