From: “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 88b787930aedbc2804dec68f1434484bfe0ba3147848cfafd463df062576b3e9
Message ID: <01BB5F54.908A60A0@geeman.vip.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-21 23:33:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 07:33:26 +0800
From: "geeman@best.com" <geeman@best.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 07:33:26 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: FW: Bashing "Wired"
Message-ID: <01BB5F54.908A60A0@geeman.vip.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
----------
From: Timothy C. May[SMTP:tcmay@got.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 1996 11:19 PM
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Bashing "Wired"
..... elided...
And notice that increasingly the "journalists" are the quoted thinkers and
strategists in important areas? Someone majors in English, starts writing
for "Netizen" or "HotWired," and the next thing you know they're debating
crypto policy with Conrad Burns and Dorothy Denning. We're in an age where
the medium truly is the message
thanks for the deconstruction on 'WiReD' - --- your last comment reminds me of Cliff Stoll's position that the Web fosters what he calls 'cacocracy' --- a community of yakking posturers with nothing to say.
I recommend his "Silicon Snake Oil" to all.
Cheers.
Return to June 1996
Return to ““geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>”
1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 07:33:26 +0800) - FW: Bashing “Wired” - “geeman@best.com” <geeman@best.com>