1996-06-04 - Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: jeremey@forequest.com (Jeremey Barrett)
Message Hash: 950502575a925066a6132ed58743d09bb7c7550e05d6b04e2851589796569f47
Message ID: <199606040508.AAA01035@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960603161453.20486C-100000@descartes.forequest.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-04 08:07:03 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 16:07:03 +0800

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 16:07:03 +0800
To: jeremey@forequest.com (Jeremey Barrett)
Subject: Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960603161453.20486C-100000@descartes.forequest.com>
Message-ID: <199606040508.AAA01035@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Jeremey Barrett wrote:
> > The "Idea Futures" forum has established odds on this. The current odds are
> > currently 60% that a 1024 bit number will be factored by 2010 and 30% that
> > a 512 bit number will be factored by 1997.
> > 
> 
> True, but by that time I'll be able to use 2048 or bigger keys with the same
> or better performance as 1024 bit keys now.  As long as factoring is
> exponential, you can always make it impossible to factor your keys. 
> And I think it will always be exponential.

Actually factoring is not exponential even now. For Number Fiels Sieve 
method the number of operations is estimated as

N ~= exp(((1.923+O(1)) * (ln n)^(1/3) * ln ln n)^(2/3))

(taken from Schneier, A.C., page 256)

	- Igor.





Thread