From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95d22d2005dfb9be884b775c0f694e0e5d29381ae912a1504b2770cb8cede659
Message ID: <199606070859.BAA24817@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-07 12:32:53 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 20:32:53 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 20:32:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cost of brute force decryption
Message-ID: <199606070859.BAA24817@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 02:44 PM 6/5/96 -0700, you wrote:
>> > "For example a 40-bit key takes about $10,000 worth of supercomputer
>> > time and two weeks to crack. Although this key may be adequate to
>> > protect my checking account, it's probably not large enough for the
>> > accounts of a major corporation.
>> The figures look familiar. No references around. I'm not sure it would
>> require a whole two weeks for 40-bits, though. Possibly less than a
>> day? (Or was that why you asked baout the figures?)
It was from The Newspapers, of course :-) The "$10,000 of supercomputer time"
was in an initial press release description by somebody in Netscape or RSA
after the RC4/40 Netscape crack, and was way high. (Check Altavista...)
However, it's not too far off for the cost of a DES crack, where "supercomputer"
is defined as "a special-purpose cracking machine" rather than "a Cray"..
(Maybe an order of magnitude high for that.) And the description of
$10,000 as "maybe enough to protect my checking account, but not large enough
for the accounts of a major corporation" is about right.
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs
# Rescind Authority!
Return to June 1996
Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
1996-06-07 (Fri, 7 Jun 1996 20:32:53 +0800) - Re: Cost of brute force decryption - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>