From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@fahlgren.com>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 9ceb4d29669313f0c5a9a673c209def1ad207a5e7f18ed09fe44510a2e690eb2
Message ID: <199606090326.XAA06963@goffer.ee.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-09 07:00:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:00:37 +0800
From: C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@fahlgren.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:00:37 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: US: Domestic Encryption Protected by US Constitution?
Message-ID: <199606090326.XAA06963@goffer.ee.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Something that has come up in my recent random thoughts...
Given that the US State Department classifies strong crypto as
munitions, is it possible that any laws passed outlawing the use of
strong crypto among US citizens could be declared unconsitutional, in
violation of the second amendment?
Are there any legal precedents that apply here? Is the question purely
academic (i.e., no such laws exist, no such bills are in the works, or
none have been tried)? Does anyone know of any laws on the books that
might be relevant to my question?
--
C Matthew Curtin Chief Hacker
Fahlgren, Inc. 655 Metro Pl S, Ste 700, Box 7159 Dublin OH 43017-7159
http://www.local.com/~cmcurtin/ cmcurtin@fahlgren.com PGP Mail Preferred
Return to June 1996
Return to “C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@fahlgren.com>”
1996-06-09 (Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:00:37 +0800) - US: Domestic Encryption Protected by US Constitution? - C Matthew Curtin <cmcurtin@fahlgren.com>