From: “Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>
To: harka@nycmetro.com
Message Hash: 9f61dede609e6c91912f8e638707b183ede4e7a19f811be4e7ace9b7674eaacd
Message ID: <Pine.SCO.3.93.960628171056.19646C-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
Reply To: <TCPSMTP.16.6.27.-15.0.46.2780269260.1184837@nycmetro.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 02:03:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 10:03:29 +0800
From: "Mark O. Aldrich" <maldrich@grci.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 10:03:29 +0800
To: harka@nycmetro.com
Subject: Re: MS-Mail Security
In-Reply-To: <TCPSMTP.16.6.27.-15.0.46.2780269260.1184837@nycmetro.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SCO.3.93.960628171056.19646C-100000@grctechs.va.grci.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 27 Jun 1996 harka@nycmetro.com wrote:
> In> I would like to gather informations of whether the MS-Mail server
> In> is secure or not, is anyone heard of somebody, say, disguise as other
> In> user or read other user e-mail?
>
> I'd also like to know how secure the MS-Mail files are (*.mmf). They are
> password protected and should be encrypted but does anybody know how
> secure?
We have worked extensively with MS Mail and providing integrated crypto
features for the product. The native security on the files is provided in
two ways: 1) The usually poor MS "scrambling" (it's not really crypto),
and 2) The discretionary access controls (DAC) of the OS. Since only NT
has decent DAC (which only works at a C2 level of trust when it's not on a
network), my opinion of the risk level would be "VERY HIGH" against
threats of repudiation, loss of confidentiality, loss of availability, and
loss of integrity.
Further, the I&A mechanisms in everything other than a stand-alone NT
environment are inadequate for any real proof of identity. They most
certainly can't offer anything close to a real non-repudiation solution.
Forging a "from" header into the database is, I would contend, fairly
simple. Reading someone else's mail is a bit harder, but not incredibly
difficult. If traditional hacking doesn't work, building a hacking tool
using MAPI (widely available API to the mail subsystem) would be fairly
straight-forward (Hmmmmm - Summer vacation programming project???).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Just as the strength of the Internet is |Mark Aldrich |
|chaos, so the strength of our liberty |GRCI INFOSEC Engineering |
|depends upon the chaos and cacophony of |maldrich@grci.com |
|the unfettered speech the First Amendment|MAldrich@dockmaster.ncsc.mil |
|Protects - Federal Judges on the CDA | |
|_______________________________________________________________________|
|The author is PGP Empowered. Public key at: finger maldrich@grci.com |
| The opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author |
| and my employer gets no credit for them whatsoever. |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to June 1996
Return to ““Mark O. Aldrich” <maldrich@grci.com>”