From: jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aa5972225ba7c939cb55251e2665874d1de0808fcbcb534edbb1412e29b508f4
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960626214217.00674520@vertexgroup.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-27 02:47:39 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 10:47:39 +0800
From: jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 10:47:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping)
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960626214217.00674520@vertexgroup.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:39 PM 6/26/96 -0400, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>An entity claiming to be William Knowles wrote:
>:
>: With all the talk about InterNIC zapping domains, there should be
>: some talk about other registries, Alternic.net : http://www.alternic.net
>: is offering an alpha test for registering new TLD's and the prices
>: are considerably less expensive than the Internic.
>:
>
>ALTERNIC.NIC is a couple of kids with a few Linux boxes. It's rather amusing,
>but they did go through a lot of trouble to make it look good. Sure,
>the new TLD's work if you use their name server.
>
>I thought about actually registering NSA.TEL and MCI.ATT with them for
>shits and giggles. I love the TLD's they have ... BSA, XXX, CAT, DOG ...
>it was a good laugh, but it's way past April 1st.
>
Well, Karl's IETF draft is certainly serious. A Karl is a bit more than a
kid with a linux box having started one of the largest ISPs in Chicago and
being a component in the anti CIX fiasco.
I still fail to see why decentralizing control of namespace is a bad idea.
Return to June 1996
Return to “jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)”
1996-06-27 (Thu, 27 Jun 1996 10:47:39 +0800) - Re: Alternic.net (was domain zapping) - jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker)