From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:59:59 +0800
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: Electronic Signature Act Of 1996
In-Reply-To: <2.2.16.19960610095811.1d4f15ba@mail.io.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960610182335.19662A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 10 Jun 1996, Greg Broiles wrote:

> At 04:24 PM 6/5/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> >Please remember that the UCC's application is generally restricted to the 
> >sales of goods or acts between merchants.
> 
> I'll "remember" this only insofar as it reminds me to read your other
> messages with a more skeptical eye. I hope you pay more attention to
> accuracy when you're at work.

In that I posted nearly the entire statute of frauds section, which was
the subject of the above comment in context, you seem to have taken the
above out of context, and applied it too broadly.

> --
> Greg Broiles                |"Post-rotational nystagmus was the subject of
> gbroiles@netbox.com         |an in-court demonstration by the People
> http://www.io.com/~gbroiles |wherein Sgt Page was spun around by Sgt
>                             |Studdard." People v. Quinn 580 NYS2d 818,825.
> 

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com