1996-06-27 - Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Rich Graves <exalt@miworld.net>
Message Hash: b886e9f48e8e2d4a7a7b7c2aa0ff7497654f510e8b9100ab78a6a85e1f2aacaf
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960626194119.007538f8@popmail.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-27 01:46:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 09:46:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 09:46:18 +0800
To: Rich Graves <exalt@miworld.net>
Subject: Re: AT&T bans anonymous messages
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960626194119.007538f8@popmail.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       SANDY SANDFORT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C'punks,

At 11:16 AM 6/26/96 -0700, Rich Graves wrote:

>I see no excuse for the craven "indecency" and "personal 
>information" bits of the AUP, but...

Plausible deniability.  Currently, the majors don't want to
be publicly associated with "naughty" uses of their networks.
The do, however, want the lucrative fees generated by them.
As a result, an enormous market niche has come open for
"resellers" of 900/976 services.  The majors can say, "We
don't offer our services to THOSE types of services, but we
are powerless to stop our resellers from doing that sort of
business."  The same rational applies to the Internet.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






Thread