From: Sean Walberg <umwalber@cc.UManitoba.CA>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bc39363ad5ae75b8340e2a00220d541f0924e08f63f52999d8abe95a68b097a9
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960612090350.20306A-100000@merak.cc.umanitoba.ca>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-12 20:25:24 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 04:25:24 +0800
From: Sean Walberg <umwalber@cc.UManitoba.CA>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 04:25:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: What constitutes a remailer?
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960612090350.20306A-100000@merak.cc.umanitoba.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
What really constitutes a remailer (pseudo-anonymous vs anonymous
arguments aside)? For example, the other day I received a message from
66west.com saying that I had a greeting card waiting, I was to go to a
certain URL and enter a simple password to retreive my "greeting card".
Now this card had no return address, no name. Could this constitute a
remailer? A while back there was a thread on how to take some of the
responsibility off of the remailer operators (the last one in the chain
more so), could this be a viable alternative? (Actually, I believe it
was discussed). As for tracking, I'm sure the server logs are rotated
often, and are not kept forever (our student page server here rotates
daily and logs are kept for 4 days AFAIK), so perhaps this may even be
less traceable. Using these greeting cards, what prohibits me from
sending a letter instead of "happy birthday"?
Will the anti-remailer people crack down on this also? I can just see
the law "Thou shalt not send greeting cards via email without photoID"
:-)
Sean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean Walberg umwalber@cc.umanitoba.ca
The Web Guy http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~umwalber
UNIX Group, U. of Manitoba PGP Key Available from Servers
Return to June 1996
Return to “Sean Walberg <umwalber@cc.UManitoba.CA>”
1996-06-12 (Thu, 13 Jun 1996 04:25:24 +0800) - What constitutes a remailer? - Sean Walberg <umwalber@cc.UManitoba.CA>