1996-06-01 - Re: The Political Map [NOISE?]

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: bc640bc0cecaaddd4aa542c1bacfb45c1f7d6995c3190160a4166d4b26b7a040
Message ID: <199606010555.BAA24446@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-01 08:27:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 16:27:16 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 16:27:16 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: The Political Map [NOISE?]
Message-ID: <199606010555.BAA24446@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 23 May 96 at 9:45, Bill Frantz wrote:

> This is because any analysis of political opinion that tries to reduce it
> to a one dimensional metric is ipso facto wrong.  Two dimensions gives you
> a much better match.  (Try personal freedom on one axis and economic
> freedom on the other.)  I suspect the more dimensions you include, the
> better you analysis will be.

Just two dimensions?

I'd be cautious of the personal freedom scale, since many groups 
aren't consistently in one place there.  Certain groups assign 
priorities to some freedoms over others, as well as who those 
freedoms apply to, etc.

 
---
No-frills sig.
Befriend my mail filter by sending a message with the subject "send help"
Key-ID: 5D3F2E99 1996/04/22 wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (root@magneto)
        AB1F4831 1993/05/10 Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Send a message with the subject "send pgp-key" for a copy of my key.





Thread