From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: bfdab77f6dcd31adfc1449819d7f7ffead39fc44c4e4b4d5aaddcd164f887097
Message ID: <199606042241.SAA09606@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199606042119.OAA07878@netcom7.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-05 08:24:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:24:42 +0800
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:24:42 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: Java
In-Reply-To: <199606042119.OAA07878@netcom7.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199606042241.SAA09606@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Bill Frantz writes:
> >You could hand any websurfer a Netscape PGP plugin without much work
> >at all, and you could easily build it on lots of platforms. After all,
> >look at how many platforms that lowly C code like PGP runs on.
>
> Why don't we have one of these now? (N.B. not a rhetorical question)
I don't know. I suppose its because cypherpunks post stupid commentary
on non-cryptographic issues. Perhaps you should suggest it as a
project on CoderPunks.
> I thought this was the effect the Unix people get when they run
> applications such as firewall code in a "chroot jail". Perhaps Netscape
> could make you happy by having its Unix based browsers run Java applet
> interpreters in such a jail. (I don't know, Unix is an imperfectly spoken
> foreign language to me.)
Chroot isn't a real solution for this sort of application.
Perry
Return to June 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”