1996-06-06 - Re: Richard Stallman on RSA, Zimmermann, crypto

Header Data

From: Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c21b59b5f073578363aac0b016ff6544d1558f511dc2eacfc14a7b6a9199c403
Message ID: <31B5BD2D.41C6@ai.mit.edu>
Reply To: <4p44o9$aan@life.ai.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-06 03:09:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 11:09:15 +0800

Raw message

From: Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 11:09:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Richard Stallman on RSA, Zimmermann, crypto
In-Reply-To: <4p44o9$aan@life.ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <31B5BD2D.41C6@ai.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Deranged Mutant wrote:
> 
> Not to defend or condemn RSA folx or patents, etc., but sometime ago
> (recently) I read or was told or perhaps hallucinated that PGP3 was
> going to include non-RSA algorithms that didn't suffer the patent
> stickiness (El Gammel based on DSA?)

DSA is based on El-Gamal, not the other way round. Although it is likely 
that a future version of PGP will include these algorithms the problem 
arises from the Diffie-Helleman patent and not the RSA patent. When this 
expires in 1997 it is certain that many products using public key 
cryptosystems will be avaliable in an unrestricted fashion.

	Phill





Thread