From: qut@netcom.com (harman.david)
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 21:22:27 +0800
To: rich@c2.org)
Subject: Re: You're a Twit! [ ]   [And, a jackass]
In-Reply-To: <199606062134.OAA20430@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <199606062147.OAA13396@netcom2.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> The message with headers below has been received and set aside for careful
> handling by carbon-based units. Thank you so much for your contribution to
> global understanding.
> 
> Love,
> Rich's Twit Acknowledger
> 
> >From qut@netcom.com Thu Jun  6 14:34:48 1996
> Received: from boron.Stanford.EDU (boron.Stanford.EDU [36.56.0.10]) by Networking.Stanford.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA20426 for <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:34:48 -0700
> Received: from netcom2.netcom.com (qut@netcom2.netcom.com [192.100.81.108]) by boron.Stanford.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA16925 for <llurch@stanford.edu>; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: (from qut@localhost) by netcom2.netcom.com (8.6.13/Netcom)
> 	id OAA12280; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:34:46 -0700
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:34:46 -0700
> From: qut@netcom.com (harman.david)
> Message-Id: <199606062134.OAA12280@netcom2.netcom.com>
> To: llurch@stanford.edu

Oh, did I miss the Cypherpunk announcment or something?
Do I care?
Isn't cypherpunking rather elitist?
Isn't elitism a signatory of worthless knowledge?

Hey, look at me, I'm elite!



-- 
Love,
Qut@netcom.com