From: vin@shore.net (Vin McLellan)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ca969b0169c655be3ba6ca72ee13b089f2ed98bfc8a4ae3a86be980d39f49dba
Message ID: <v02140b03adec9a570eca@[206.243.160.205]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-19 01:07:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:07:36 +0800
From: vin@shore.net (Vin McLellan)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 09:07:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Mail Exploders"
Message-ID: <v02140b03adec9a570eca@[206.243.160.205]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Wonderful tale! I can see that -- maybe, just maybe -- AOL or
another targeted online community (a semi-moderated mailing list or even a
semi-moderated newsgroup) could be slapped for just bouncing the SPAM back
at the sender.
I bet they could get away with it, however, if they appended a
brief polite notice that this mailing exceeds some (anti-spam) perimeters
that the subscribers of AOL (or other online community) agreed -- in their
intial subscriber contracts -- to have AOL refuse for them.
(Which text, of course, would add to the reply mail burden for the
Spammer's IAP.)
The only meaningful control on SPAM I can see is to start enforcing
a chain of contracts that forbid it (without reference to content) from the
backbone back through the IAPs to the users. (I think Long-Morrow at Yale
had a nice paper on this a couple of years back.) But this sort of
auto-return mechanism could make a dent on the super-Spanners now.
Yea for AOL!
Suerte,
_Vin
> On Nerd AOL using explosive mail, this Cyberia-L pointer:
>
> http://infolawalert.com/stories/061496a.html
>
> [Excerpts]
>
> Cyber Promotions sends a collection of short ads, written
> as if they were newspaper classifieds, to upward of 900,000
> recipients, 600,000 of whom are America OnLine subscribers.
>
> America OnLine contends that its computer systems have been
> swamped by Cyber Promotion's mass mailings, especially when
> 5,000 undeliverable messages start to pile up each day. ...
>
> When the mailings continued, an AOL employee collected a
> bunch of Cyber Promotions's undeliverable messages and
> redirected them to UUNET, a large Internet service provider
> used by Cyber Promotions.
>
> According to Cyber Promotions' complaint, this "stunt,
> known as an 'e-mail bomb,' was knowingly and maliciously
> sent to UUNET by AOL in order to severely tie up and/or
> bring down UUNET's computer system." UUNET subsequently
> cancelled Cyber Promotion's account.
>
> According to Cyber Promotions' complaint, AOL bombed
> another service provider used by Cyber Promotions. ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
Vin McLellan +The Privacy Guild+ <vin@shore.net>
53 Nichols St., Chelsea, Ma. 02150 USA Tel: (617) 884-5548
<*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*>
Return to June 1996
Return to “vin@shore.net (Vin McLellan)”