1996-06-04 - Re: CWD: “Jacking in from the “One that Got Away” Port

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cc4390aceac8ea5cdfe6926a173aed28d3bb2414f462964c83a2d1018d90479c
Message ID: <199606040831.EAA12343@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-04 11:39:33 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 19:39:33 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 19:39:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CWD: "Jacking in from the "One that Got Away" Port
Message-ID: <199606040831.EAA12343@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On  3 Jun 96 at 22:19, Declan McCullagh wrote:

> (By Brock Meeks / brock@well.com / Archived at http://www.cyberwerks.com/)
>  CyberWire Dispatch // Copyright (c) 1996 //
>  Jacking in from the "One that Got Away" Port:
[..]
>  That key length stuff is just so much gibberish to those playing
>  without a scorecard, so let me drill down on it for you.  Basically,
>  the longer the key length, the harder it is for a message to be broken
>  by "brute force" automated attacks.  Current U.S. laws prohibit the
>  export of any encryption device with a key length longer than 40-bits,
>  or roughly the equivalent of  Captain Crunch decoder ring. For hardcore
>  math types, I'm told that a 1024-bit key length is 10 to the 296th
>  power more difficult to break than 40 bits.

Too bad he got caught up in the gibberish.

 
---
No-frills sig.
Befriend my mail filter by sending a message with the subject "send help"
Key-ID: 5D3F2E99 1996/04/22 wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (root@magneto)
        AB1F4831 1993/05/10 Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Send a message with the subject "send pgp-key" for a copy of my key.





Thread