From: tonie@efn.org (Tonie Nathan)
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: ea5ae7fda8ecee14ce931c98daed88daf10e7e75fec041edf9fc3b3d900f4bf1
Message ID: <199606200837.BAA17016@haus.efn.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-20 11:50:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:50:30 +0800
From: tonie@efn.org (Tonie Nathan)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:50:30 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Matching funds
Message-ID: <199606200837.BAA17016@haus.efn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In 1996, the Libertarian Party will apparently qualify for Federal matching
>>>funds for its Presidential political campaign. That does not mean that it
>>>will _accept_ them, being stolen goods. However, a few years ago I heard of
>>>an idea that they should accept the money, and return it to the people, a
>>>small amount at a time, to whomever asks for it. Besides returning the
>>>stolen money to its rightful owners, that would produce substantial positive
>>>publicity for the Libertarian party, embarrassment for the Democrats and
>>>Republicans, while at the same time reducing the amount of money available
>>>for the D's and the R's.
>>>
>>>
You can buy a helluva lot more publicity with the matching funds. I'm not
advocating this, just pointing it out.
Tonie
Return to June 1996
Return to “tonie@efn.org (Tonie Nathan)”
1996-06-20 (Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:50:30 +0800) - Matching funds - tonie@efn.org (Tonie Nathan)