From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f709f0708e3de1d46be6e76fa337decabf4c4d96d87913d39228b6ae75def76e
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960603182733.006b6250@mail.aracnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-04 00:39:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 08:39:13 +0800
From: Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 08:39:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960603182733.006b6250@mail.aracnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:33 AM 6/3/96 +0000, Deranged Mutant wrote:
>In part because it's not well integrated with mailers. That could
>change with a PGP3 DLL.
I have a growing feeling that PGP 3 is never going to happen. Or that if it
does, it will happen only after the passage of more draconian anti-privacy
laws, and the guys working on it will be forced to include sundry backdoor
stuff or drop it altogether.
I suspect someone could do quite nicely by going ahead and developing a
2.6.2 or 2.6.3 DLL.
--
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce
Return to June 1996
Return to “Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>”
1996-06-04 (Tue, 4 Jun 1996 08:39:13 +0800) - Re: Why PGP isn’t so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss) - Bruce Baugh <bruce@aracnet.com>