1996-06-29 - Re: mocking paranoia

Header Data

From: Cerridwyn Llewyellyn <ceridwyn@wolfenet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f7441b51af4f1e621af66ace972f374d6ede5324d9de7e39caf98c882820a8d5
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960629122315.0068dd0c@gonzo.wolfenet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 14:26:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 22:26:53 +0800

Raw message

From: Cerridwyn Llewyellyn <ceridwyn@wolfenet.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 22:26:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: mocking paranoia
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960629122315.0068dd0c@gonzo.wolfenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:58 AM 6/29/96 nelson@crynwr.com wrote:
>Earlier, someone mocked someone else for being paranoid.  Sorry, but
>this is a mistake.  By definition, you have a non-empty threat model
>when you set out to encrypt; therefore you must be paranoid to use
>encryption.  Or else they really *could* be out to get you, but
>sometimes it's not possible to tell, and you have to assume that they
>are.

heh... "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you."






Thread