From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: “geeman@best.com>
Message Hash: ffcee01f9d79ffd53e784b2588e7e2da1e6bb9f3e5456ca78e40e542075ff730
Message ID: <199606220824.BAA26718@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-22 13:51:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 21:51:10 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 21:51:10 +0800
To: "geeman@best.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Bashing "Wired"
Message-ID: <199606220824.BAA26718@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:32 AM 6/21/96 -0700, you wrote:
>And notice that increasingly the "journalists" are the quoted thinkers and
>strategists in important areas? Someone majors in English, starts writing
>for "Netizen" or "HotWired," and the next thing you know they're debating
>crypto policy with Conrad Burns and Dorothy Denning. We're in an age where
>the medium truly is the message
You don't think the rest of the press is truly any better, do you?
At least on the net, you get to see the horse's mouth on a bad day,
and sometimes you can even meet the people and track down the rumors
hat eventually become headlines, and pull the wool over your own eyes.
Dorothy Denning may know a lot of mathematics about cryptography,
but that doesn't make her any more fit to decide what policies the
government ought to enforce than I am. She'll get the
technical details correct far more often than Senator Burns,
as would most people here, but being a trained ethicist would perhaps
be more relevant than being a trained mathematician - it doesn't take
that much technical explanation to know that crypto lets you have
private conversations.
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs
# Dispel Authority!
Return to June 1996
Return to ““Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>”