From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: “Bill Olson (EDP)” <a-billol@microsoft.com>
Message Hash: 035e20a8cdc5da3a2c89aa7a7fcc2db307a61b6bf3bc51c8714c067dbb0a7eab
Message ID: <199607230044.UAA13038@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-16-MSG-960723000701Z-34713@tide21.microsoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-23 12:03:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 20:03:46 +0800
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 20:03:46 +0800
To: "Bill Olson (EDP)" <a-billol@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Noise] was Re: Giving 6 year old kids Uzi's
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-16-MSG-960723000701Z-34713@tide21.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <199607230044.UAA13038@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"Bill Olson (EDP)" writes:
> I don't care if it takes my son 6 years to get through 2 grade levels,
> anyone who allows there kid to pack a gun (or a rifle?) should get their
> head examined
Why? What, objectively, is wrong with allowing, say, a twelve year old
to go plinking with a .22? Lets not hear vitriol -- lets just hear
cold hard reasons not to allow it.
Myself, I'd say that it appears that there is no good objective
reason.
Perry
Return to July 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”