1996-07-23 - Re: [Noise] was Re: Giving 6 year old kids Uzi’s

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: “Bill Olson (EDP)” <a-billol@microsoft.com>
Message Hash: 035e20a8cdc5da3a2c89aa7a7fcc2db307a61b6bf3bc51c8714c067dbb0a7eab
Message ID: <199607230044.UAA13038@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-16-MSG-960723000701Z-34713@tide21.microsoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-23 12:03:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 20:03:46 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 20:03:46 +0800
To: "Bill Olson (EDP)" <a-billol@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Noise] was Re: Giving 6 year old kids Uzi's
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-16-MSG-960723000701Z-34713@tide21.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <199607230044.UAA13038@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



"Bill Olson (EDP)" writes:
> I don't care if it takes my son 6 years to get through 2 grade levels,
> anyone who allows there kid to pack a gun (or a rifle?) should get their
> head examined

Why? What, objectively, is wrong with allowing, say, a twelve year old
to go plinking with a .22? Lets not hear vitriol -- lets just hear
cold hard reasons not to allow it.

Myself, I'd say that it appears that there is no good objective
reason.

Perry





Thread