1996-07-25 - Re: [Rant]Re: Shell buys key escrow system from TIS

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
Message Hash: 04261035f2e4fb671be0b8cc1c8ef7cc872ee934f2e8763cea48d25fa86fc876
Message ID: <199607251921.MAA01459@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-25 23:00:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 07:00:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 07:00:35 +0800
To: liberty@gate.net (Jim Ray)
Subject: Re: [Rant]Re: Shell buys key escrow system from TIS
Message-ID: <199607251921.MAA01459@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 06:20 AM 7/25/96 -0400, Jim Ray wrote:
>Will Rodger,<rodger@interramp.com>
>Washington Bureau Chief of Inter@ctive Week, wrote:
><snips>
>>Administration officials didn't return calls for comment, but it's clear
>>that the Clinton-Gore team have their first "testbed" for trying out key
>>recovery, or key escrow, proposals.
>
>Hmmm.  A new meme, "key recovery" is lots better than "key escrow," but
>I still wonder if I'm ever gonna see a journalist say, "'GAK,' or Govt.
>Access to Keys for cryptography."

I doubt we'll see many non-cyber-journalists saying "GAK", at least in print :-)
But the name "Clipper III" seems to be catching on fairly well,
which has the added benefit if connoting "yet another key-grabbing
attempt after the previous two failures", which I like a lot.

Key recovery is at least quasi-honest, unlike "key escrow";
I'd tend to call the Clintonista's scheme "key registration"
though I've generally found that "master key system" gets the point across
adequately.



#				Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs
#				Confuse Authority!






Thread