1996-07-23 - Re: Borders are transparent

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 09adc7d599731c33f173ab03775a529053f069ca84dbeed0a77fe3eae4236ca4
Message ID: <v02120d12ae197fe1f4c9@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-23 05:01:51 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 13:01:51 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 13:01:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Borders *are* transparent
Message-ID: <v02120d12ae197fe1f4c9@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 4:50 7/23/96, Paul Foley wrote:
>"Peter Trei" <trei@process.com> wrote:
>
>   Any one up for a distributed brute force attack on single DES? My
>   back-of-the-envelope calculations and guesstimates put this on the
>   hairy edge of doability (the critical factor is how many machines can
>   be recruited - a non-trivial cash prize would help).
>
>Not quite sure what you mean by "doability" -- it's obviously doable,
>it just depends how long you want to wait.
>
>I'm in.

Same here. I think it is about time for another full scale hack. Breaking
DES would help get our message more than breaking 40bit RC-4 ever did.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
   Vote Harry Browne for President.







Thread