1996-07-20 - Re: Netscape download requirements

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: Remo Pini <rp@rpini.com>
Message Hash: 0b5796417c7193b5c29f9b0c5fc2417fd1d3a2c03886ae63205b6344ab051289
Message ID: <31F0CC92.44D7@netscape.com>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19960719222040.008f8914@193.246.3.200>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-20 14:57:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:57:25 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 22:57:25 +0800
To: Remo Pini <rp@rpini.com>
Subject: Re: Netscape download requirements
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960719222040.008f8914@193.246.3.200>
Message-ID: <31F0CC92.44D7@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Remo Pini wrote:
> 
> Why can't anybody in US write a little program that compares the two 4.5 meg
> install files and make a patcher? (It seems simple to do, is very
> inconspicuous and of course does not violate the ITAR - although it might
> violate some copyright stuff, but hey, whos willing to enforce something
> like that, when it's anonymously posted or mailed)

  Actually a lawyer once told me that such a patch might be considered
a "defense repair", and thus be regulated by the ITAR.  I kid you not.
Your bits would fall into the same bucket as missile parts.  The more
I learn about ITAR and the way the government tries to link software
to it, the more amazed I get.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread