1996-07-26 - RE: Bandwidth

Header Data

From: root <root@bunch.ci.houston.tx.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 13e228ead884dd321c0aa02dea0381eaca7b7512268cf9ea01419a8c147f0bbd
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960726032153.2474C-100000@bunch.ci.houston.tx.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-26 10:53:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:53:12 +0800

Raw message

From: root <root@bunch.ci.houston.tx.us>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 18:53:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Bandwidth
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960726032153.2474C-100000@bunch.ci.houston.tx.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I guess the statement about this being an "active" list was a little 
understated - however it did not mention anything about being used as a 
personal forum for petty bickering.  I have a slow link (see 9600bps) to the 
internet and have been watching messages steadily trickle in for the past 
two or three hours concerning Rush and a "wager" between two people - I 
notice that they copy the other interested party as if they would not 
receive it via the list like EVERYONE ELSE DOES!

Maybe I'm opening myself up for a flame - I might even deserve it if this 
discussion in fact does have something to do with cryptography and or 
related bits of information.  If it does - please let me know (private 
mail is fine - you can even copy the list if you feel everyone deserves 
to see me ripped to shreds).

My 2 cents,
Al

-
No, not like Bundy!






Thread