1996-07-24 - Re: DES-Busting Screen Savers?

Header Data

From: Steve Reid <root@edmweb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 14f73553b975eb9fe284a803ebc4f4961392221918b8be469633119baa25908d
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960724023443.627B-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960724015854.627A-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-24 12:12:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:12:23 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve Reid <root@edmweb.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 20:12:23 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DES-Busting Screen Savers?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960724015854.627A-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960724023443.627B-100000@bitbucket.edmweb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


A few seconds ago, I wrote:
> One potential problem is actually choosing the random keys. Have to be
> able to get entropy at a fast rate, and/or use a good PRNG. Both of these
> things would take time away from the actuall cracking (more time than just
> incrementing the key).

It's probably best to just choose a random starting point, and increment 
from there. I don't think that will affect the odds any. Problem solved.

I thought of this less than a second after I sent the message out. :-/


=====================================================================
| Steve Reid - SysAdmin & Pres, EDM Web (http://www.edmweb.com/)    |
| Email: steve@edmweb.com   Home Page: http://www.edmweb.com/steve/ |
| PGP (2048/9F317269) Fingerprint: 11C89D1CD67287E68C09EC52443F8830 |
|          -- Disclaimer: JMHO, YMMV, TANSTAAFL, IANAL. --          |
===================================================================:)





Thread