From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: jim bell <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 27a4dec0e813cb6459ef95367e0e28cefcfc0f28f8ddb3bfde470e738ea39b3d
Message ID: <199607031659.JAA25899@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-03 21:32:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 05:32:30 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 1996 05:32:30 +0800
To: jim bell <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SAFE Forum--some comments
Message-ID: <199607031659.JAA25899@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 9:34 PM 7/2/96 -0800, jim bell wrote:
>However, that AT+T fellow who revealed the phone records to the militia
>group would also be an appropriate comparison to destroy the "key-escrow"
>idea. I assume AT+T had procedures in place which were SUPPOSED TO prevent
>this. Well, key-escrow agents "will" also have similar procedures. Why
>should we assume they will be more reliable?
We shouldn't. In fact, they will have a much higher economic value. I
would expect them to be more vulnerable to insiders.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The Internet may fairly be | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | regarded as a never-ending | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | worldwide conversation. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to July 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
1996-07-03 (Thu, 4 Jul 1996 05:32:30 +0800) - Re: SAFE Forum–some comments - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)