From: David Rosoff <drosoff@ARC.unm.EDU>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 10:03:49 +0800
To: Eric Murray <bqm1808@is.nyu.edu (Brendon Macaraeg)
Subject: Re: "privatizing" phones?
Message-ID: <1.5.4.16.19960728232828.46cf5af8@arc.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 04.11 PM 7/26/96 -0700, Eric Murray wrote:

>It's a 46mhz analog model, newer phones use frequencies
>in the 900mhz range and/or digital encoding.
>The 900mhz range is one of those 'blocked' in most newer radio
>scanners, this is required by law as of a few years ago.
>Many scanners can have some or all of the locked-out
>ranges restored by suitable modification (i.e. removing
>a resistor).  Many of these mods are posted on the net.

One of my friends has a Radio Shack scanner (the cat.
# of which I do not recall) which does pick up the 900MHz
range. We tried (unsuccessfully) to modify it according to
an internet posting. I don't know how old it is.

===============================================================================
David Rosoff (nihongo ga sukoshi dekiru)  --------------->  drosoff@arc.unm.edu
PGP public key 0xD37692F9 -----> finger drosoff@acoma.arc.unm.edu or keyservers
0xD37692F9  Key fingerprint =  25 7D AA 01 85 41 43 89  50 5A 33 76 F1 F1 99 67
Do you know who's reading your email? ---> http://www.arc.unm.edu/~drosoff/pgp/
Is it a forgery? --- I have PGP signed all email and news posts since May 1996.
===============================================================================
"Relax. It's not a real alarm. They can't crack _Pentagon_ codes. Can they?" :p

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMfqQkRguzHDTdpL5AQFCuQP+ILE3NAbjEZ2p6d6WDIhoi9yNYafQOiSv
u00hink6Ylz8pQGP1xhQ9Bsn5pLyrS9Mck/UJ4Qw6omJBrE2LkgNy5Du8xdkqlQu
9MZaVqPXYphnGdAJ+oORXhvSkI9G0qYZPJjByypMd4Da92vqmDogrdTJFKgK21vh
OeTNyh8i+zQ=
=55JX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----