From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 32bb2144ad41e4707a89d6cc010e2e93e6661e34e13535c9050e8de45530563d
Message ID: <01I7LFV08TDW9EDGT3@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-28 13:02:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 21:02:27 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 1996 21:02:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Security debate after Olympics bombing
Message-ID: <01I7LFV08TDW9EDGT3@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Well, at least some people have the right idea.
-Allen
>Experts point out differences in Atlanta, TWA incidents
> _(c) Copyright Nando.net_
> The Associated Press
> WASHINGTON -- With nerves already on edge after the suspicious downing
> of TWA Flight 800, the bombing at the Olympic Games in Atlanta on
> Saturday renewed concerns about U.S. safeguards against terrorism.
> But analyses by security experts drew important distinctions between
> the incidents, and politicians cautioned against measures that would
> limit liberties.
> Investigators have not officially determined what caused the Flight
> 800 tragedy, but if the jetliner was brought down by terrorists it was
> a relatively sophisticated operation.
> By comparison, the device in Atlanta was easy to make and detonated in
> an easily accessible place. "I don't believe that a pipe bomb would
> have taken down that TWA plane," said a Treasury agent, who requested
anonymity.
> Another federal investigator noted differences between the Atlanta
> attack and Middle Eastern terrorists who often use high-powered truck
> bombs. And domestic militia groups tend to focus on government
> buildings, not crowds.
> James Alan Fox, the dean of Northeastern University's criminal justice
> school and a student of criminal behavior, said there are basically
> two motivations for bombers: revenge and attention.
> "The desire to make a statement can be that of a well-organized
> terrorist group that uses the victims as pawns to advance their cause,
> or it could be someone who is just interested in feeling important,"
> he said.
> Given the recent rise of violent anti-government groups, Fox
> speculated that a militia sympathizer might use such an event to grab
> the spotlight.
> "Through an amateurish bombing like this, he can feel like he's part
> of the movement," Fox said. "He can elevate his sense of importance."
[...]
> And building one is almost as simple. "If you don't know how to do it,
> there are any number of books available ... that will teach you
> explicitly, step-by-step, how to manufacture the device," Vitch said.
[...]
> House Speaker Newt Gingrich stressed that security was already high at
> the Olympics, and cautioned against adopting a "police state"
> mentality.
> "If a terrorist is nutty enough, there's always an opportunity for
> tragedy," he said, appearing after Nunn on CNN. "A free people can't
> back down."
Return to July 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-07-28 (Sun, 28 Jul 1996 21:02:27 +0800) - Security debate after Olympics bombing - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>